Solar Ain’t Solar – Dissecting the Cost of Quality Solar in Australia

This article was written by Andrew Mitchell, Product Line Manager at Enphase Australia

As with any product or service, the age old saying generally holds true; you get what you pay for. Everyone likes a good bargain, and there is a lot to be said for shopping around to squeeze a few percentage points off the recommended retail price to arrive at the market price, but in an industry that is largely misunderstood by consumers, shopping around for the best price generally comes with some compromise on quality. This article seeks to highlight where the true cost of solar lies and how this should be considered when deciding to invest in your energy independence.

Entering a new market as a consumer can be quite overwhelming. Most of us don’t really have the time to educate ourselves on the finer points of the product or service we are looking for so will do a quick google search or phone a friend, but the less we know about a product or service, the less likely we are to consider our options. With a lovely touch of irony, I would like to draw a parallel between the 1980’s “oils ain’t oils” campaign that Castrol ran in an attempt to draw consumers attention to the importance of quality in an out of sight, out of mind commodity and the level of appreciation for the quality of rooftop solar which will sit on a roof for up to 25 years. Solar ain’t solar.

Let’s look at the main physical components of a rooftop solar system.

Photovoltaic (PV) modules

Fundamentally, they all do the same thing. They allow photons of light to transfer their energy to electrons which are the driving force behind what we call electricity. There are really no features that differentiate PV modules that are tangible to the consumer other than those that influence reliability and safety.

Module efficiency is somewhat debateable because all modules are rated (and priced) according to their generation capacity under standard test conditions. This essentially normalises any efficiency differences and just means that low efficiency modules will take up more space when compared to high efficiency modules. Nonetheless, higher efficiency modules are a good indication that the manufacturer values quality which is probably of greater importance to you than roof space.

Solar Inverters

Generally referred to as power electronics, solar inverters are more complex than PV modules and therefore have more of an opportunity to offer tangible value through feature sets such as module level power electronics (MLPE), monitoring and advanced grid functionality. But at the end of the day, all they are really doing is converting the direct current (DC) that is generated by the PV module to alternating current (AC) so that it can be used by your household appliances. So again, the main points of difference are reliability and safety.

Let’s take a moment to explore safety and reliability.


There are many aspects of a solar system that influence its safety, such as: the quality of workmanship, the quality of the protection devices, isolation and electrical components, and the electrical potential or voltage. While the industry is reasonably well regulated by product standards that dictate minimum requirements from manufacturers and installation standards and certifications that mandate a minimum level of diligence from the installer. Those of you who saw the ABC’s article however, will be aware that enforcing these standards can be quite difficult so it pays to do your due diligence when engaging an installer. At the end of the day, the level of quality you get will come at a cost. For further reading on safe solar I suggest you visit the Safe Solar website.


Safety and reliability are closely linked. Most products are designed to be safe under normal operation, but it is more difficult and more costly to design products that are safe under fault conditions, or what we call “fail safe”. So, when reliability is compromised, it tends to introduce a risk to safety.

System performance is also a function of reliability and while the implications of underperformance are far less severe than safety, the likelihood of it occurring is much higher. Systems with a single point of failure, like the common DC string inverter, offer no redundancy; if the string inverter has a reliability issue then the entire system is compromised. Distributed systems like micro inverters offer nth level redundancy because the reliability of one inverter does not affect the rest of the system. To avoid surprise power bills, it is always a great idea to monitor your system performance proactively. All reputable inverters come with performance monitoring, but again, it comes at a cost so if you opt for the cheapest you may be subscribing to the “ignorance is bliss” philosophy.

While PV modules may all look very similar on a data sheet or when glancing up at them from street level, there are vast differences in quality which are reflected in the huge range in price (see table 2). A typical PV module has hundreds of potential points of failure, all of which must stand the test of time exposed to the elements on your roof. Quality controls on components and assembly all come at a cost so be wary of the cheaper option, it may be banking on the fact that your cheap inverter packs it in first, so you simply won’t know any better.

I hope now that the reader can appreciate that while an electron is an electron, the manner in which it is generated can vary significantly and consequently have a substantial impact on the long-term performance of the system.

But why would you pay twice as much for a quality solar system, can there really be that much difference? Australians are blessed with the most affordable solar in the world due to healthy government funded incentives and a highly competitive market and therefore find it hard to appreciate the true cost of solar. The median price in Australia for a fully installed 6.6kW system in 2019 is around one third of the price of an equivalent system in the United States or Europe.

Table 1. Median prices (after rebates) of solar in AUD 2019

To make this a little easier to digest, let’s break it down and see where the costs lie.

Table 2. Cost breakdown of a low and high end 6.6kWp solar system

Note: These figures are indicative of the national average and may vary from state to state.

You can see that all the way through the value chain there is a cost associated to quality. We have already discussed where the value lies for PV Modules and Inverters so let’s now look at the other two main components.


While there are a few ways to reduce the cost of labour, the principal opportunity is to simply reduce the amount of time you spend installing the system. Quality workmanship that will result in a long lasting, safe installation takes a level of care that simply cannot be avoided. If an installer offers to save you a few bucks on labour by taking some short cuts you will inevitably pay for it in the long run.


This is a very important cost component to appreciate because on the surface it looks like the high-end system retailer is simply pocketing more of your hard-earned cash than the low-end retailer, but there are some very good reasons for this.

First of all, for a business to be sustainable it has to be profitable. The Australian solar industry is sadly notorious for its fly by night retail companies that are here today and gone tomorrow. Since 2011 there have been over 700 solar companies listed on the ASIC website as being closed, in liquidation, administrators appointed or proposed de-registration. When you purchase a solar system, it comes with a product warranty from the manufacturer, but it also comes with a workmanship warranty from the company you bought it from. If this company does not last as long as your solar system, then you could find yourself in a tricky situation. One of the down sides of a price driven market is the slippery slope to non-profitability. It may sound counter intuitive, but you want your service provider to be profitable.

The second consideration for margin is after sales support. Companies that truly value customer satisfaction will often factor in the cost of a return visit to service your system, or the cost of support staff to answer your calls if you need assistance in the future. If they cannot afford to allocate some of their profits to these services, then you can be sure that you will find it hard to solicit them when the need arises.

STCs, aka ‘rebates’

It’s now clear why a quality solar system can cost twice as much as the bottom of the range offering, but why is it that some systems can cost up to 3 times as much? Well, this is where the government incentives begin to distort things. Under the federal rebate program designed to achieve our renewable energy target (RET), renewable energy certificates (RECs)[i] are awarded ahead of time. In fact, when the paperwork for your system is submitted to the REC registry, you will be granted up to 15[ii] years’ worth of small-scale generation certificates (STCs) that can be liquidated immediately. These are called “deemed RECs” and by lowering the out of pocket cost of all systems, they are effectively increasing the percentage premium paid for a quality system. Instead of paying around twice as much ($14,795 versus $6,596) you end up paying around 3 times as much $11,297 versus, $3,478).

While this federally funded incentive has done a lot to nurture Australia’s booming solar industry, it is tied to energy generation that does not exist yet and quite frankly, is unlikely to ever exist in full. The biggest shortcoming of this scheme is that there is no accountability. You could install the cheapest system on offer which may stop working 6 months down the track with no support from your retailer who is no longer in business, or you could install the highest quality system that continues to generate energy for 15 years and beyond and you will receive exactly the same amount of STCs which you can convert in to the same amount of cash on day one. What makes this situation even worse is that the poor quality products that this program subsidises are ending up in landfill and being replaced by more poor quality products because it makes more financial sense to replace your modules and cash in on additional deemed STCs. By supporting low quality products, you are ultimately increasing your environmental impact which most likely contradicts the very reason for your purchase in the first place.

…compared with the USA

Things are different in the USA. Systems cost the consumer a lot more money and are therefore often sold with finance options or power purchase agreements where the ongoing performance of the rooftop solar system is imperative to the company selling or backing the asset. As a result, the cheaper products we see in Australia are not present in the market because the finance companies simply won’t take the risk. If they are not willing to risk investing in cheap products, why should you?

It is also worth mentioning here that safety driven regulatory requirements such as rapid shutdown have also excluded the cheaper products from the US market because they are unable to meet the requirements. In Australia however, the onus is on the consumer to voluntarily pay for the additional costs associated with the safety benefits of rapid shutdown.


The point I am trying to make here is that it is important to consider your solar investment over the medium to long term rather than just the upfront cost. On average, a 6.6kW solar system will deliver about $150 of savings a month to the system owner. At $1,800 of savings a year, a quality system will soon pay for itself and continue to deliver return on investment for up to 25 years, while a cheaper system will be lucky to last 5 years. A simple cash flow analysis will make your decision a no brainer.

Furthermore, the embedded energy of the system (the amount of energy it took to manufacture and transport) can sometimes take longer to pay off than the financial investment, so if you are purchasing solar for environmental reasons, quality should be your primary consideration.

There are many things to consider when it comes to purchasing a rooftop solar system and they will vary for each individual. I hope that this article has equipped you with some useful information that will give you the confidence to have the right conversations when entering the market.

[i] Renewable Energy Certificates are split into two types; small-scale technology certificates (STCs) (<100kW) and large-scale generation certificates (>100kW).

[ii] Up until 2015 you were awarded 15 years of deemed RECs, this is being reduced by one every year until it is completely phased out in 2030.

Panels, Shade and Diodes


Soft shading is caused by objects that are far away, most notably clouds. While this type of shading is not controllable, it’s factored into your yield estimate. You’ll also find that when it is cloudy, diffuse radiation still hits the panel, enabling a little bit of power generation. Shading from clouds is almost always uniform, and uniform shading is easier to manage. We’ll discuss why later.

Hard shading is caused by solid objects close to the panel. Examples of this include flues, chimneys, leaves, dirt, trees, birds, bird droppings, other roof areas, antennas etc. These objects can block more sunlight on affected areas than soft shading. It’s incorrect to assume that shading a small portion of the system is not a big issue, as non uniform shading is very difficult to manage. It can also cause unwanted side effects and damage to a panel. To understand this, we need to know how panels and strings work.


Panels are made up of solar cells, most commonly 60 cells. These cells are connected in series, with three bypass diodes installed on each sub-string of 20 cells.
In a string inverter system, panels are connected in series. The voltage increases for every panel you have in the string, while the current remains the same. String length can vary, but for 60 cell panels they are usually around 6 to 14 panels long, depending on panel voltage and inverter limits. You can also connect strings of equal length (voltage) in parallel. This increases the current, while keeping the voltage the same. To do this, the inverter must be able to handle the added current.

Panels in this configuration are connected to an inverters Maximum Power Point Tracker (MPPT), which determines the most effective operating voltage for the string (or multiple strings) of panels connected to it. Most string inverters 3 kW and above have two MPPTs, which allows groups of panels to be connected and managed separately. This opens up multiple possibilities, like better shade management and added flexibility in design.


If a totally opaque object is blocking all the cell, no current is being produced. If a half-opaque object is blocking only half the cell, 25% of the cell current is lost. Current loss is proportional to the amount of sunlight being blocked. Overall loss is higher though, as cells connected in a string can only output at the current of the lowest producing cell. Remember, power equals the voltage multiplied by current, so dropping one of these reduces your power.

At a certain point, a cell goes into “reverse bias voltage” where all flow stops and the cell converts current from the other cells into heat, creating a “hotspot”. A hotspot can cause a range of unwanted effects, like burn outs, faster degradation and cracking of the cell and/or glass. All panels have bypass diodes installed which prevents hotspots, but they aren’t perfect.

In string systems, because the panels are connected in series, a panel producing less current reduces the current (and therefore the power produced) in the entire string. A completely shaded panel will produce much less voltage. If enough panels in the string are shaded the voltage of the string will drop to the point where the string produces little or no power at all.
Only hard shadows will cause the above to occur. Soft shadows will impact all the panels evenly and not block as much sunlight. This is why hard shadows are worse than soft shadows.


Solar panels are fitted with bypass diodes, usually three, which enables current to flow around any sub-strings that have a cell in reverse bias. This prevents hotspots from occurring. It also stops any lower current producing cells from lowering the current of all the cells. There are issues with bypass diodes, however.

An activated bypass diode will cut off that entire sub-string, which is 20 of the 60 cells on a conventional panel. This cuts the output of the panel by just over a third (1/3 lost voltage plus a tiny bit of diode resistance). Unfortunately though, bypass diodes are not known for their lifespan, and regularly activating them will not help this. If the diode fails in a short circuit it will no longer protect the cells on the sub-string from hotspots, leading to further issues. If it fails open circuit it will permanently disable the sub-string.

If you have two strings connected in parallel to one MPPT and one has activated bypass diodes, it’s going to create false maximum power points. This is an issue with a string inverter. In this case, the string with the diodes activated will have a lower voltage. When this happens, even intelligent string inverters will lock onto the incorrect operating voltage, resulting in high yield losses. Soft shading, or light variations between parallel strings (like east/west), are not a big issue. These shading effects are uniform and don’t activate the bypass diodes, meaning the voltages of each string are similar under these conditions.


Bypass diodes can and do fail. This can be due to long periods at high current and high temperature when they are actively bypassing shaded cells, or due to their Peak Inverse Voltage rating being exceeded such as when a nearby lightning strike occurs. The practical way to determine the health of Bypass Diodes is with an I-V curve tracer such as the HT Instruments IV400. By analysing PV array, string, or module I-V curves, it is possible to quickly identify anomalies due to short circuit Bypass Diodes.

Failed diodes can be quickly detected using a thermal imaging camera. This photo shows an IR image of the PV module with a failed bypass diode. In the PV module, the solar cells connected to the normal bypass diode and failed bypass diode have different surface temperatures. The reason is that a failed bypass diode constitutes a closed circuit with the connected solar cells, and the current generated from the solar cells induces heat in the solar cells. Therefore, the surface temperature of the solar cells on the module connected to the failed bypass diode is higher than that of the solar cells connected to the normal bypass diode.


A normal string inverter has to consider all the panels within an MPPT when managing output. Enphase systems are able to manage panels individually, resulting in better performance in shaded conditions.
Enphase systems enable more drastic changes to voltage and current on shaded panels, while other panels can operate normally. Bigger changes to the voltage and current of shaded panels not only provides better output, but in some circumstances avoids the bypass diodes activating. Both of these are important for shade management.

Importantly these features also reduce stress on the panels, leading to much better reliability. In addition, any panel failures are easily spotted using the Enlighten monitoring.

Enphase vs Trannergy

Avid readers will remember I have two favourite inverters.
There’s my sentimental favourite, the Trannergy (aka Shanghai Grrl) and the Enphase.
Well, yesterday we replaced a 6 year old grrl that was playing during a lightning storm (this did not end well) with an Enphase IQ7+ system. The grrl lost one of her MPPTs and her logging.
The ET 200W panels had copped a million volts and instantly got coffee stains on the cells. We replaced the ETs with REC 320NPeaks.
Anthony is on the 44c tariff so we had to keep the inverter and array size less than the original, but it’s only 100W less.
Anthony’s grrl has been chatting to incessantly for the last 6 years.
So what we have now is the ability to compare an identical string and micro system on the same roof.
Guess what? The Enphase is running at 18 – 20% better than the old grrl.
Here’s a comparison between the Enphase/REC and the Trannergy/ET from two years ago
This tells me that Enphase isn’t just for tricky or shady roofs
Yes, Enphase is more expensive than a Trannergy ( or any string inverter) but if you want to maximise the yield from your roof and you want a safe solar system without DC isolators please get in touch.
Of course, if Enphase is out of your budget, you really can’t beat a grrl. Particularly when she’s all dressed up with a Solar Analytic and a Catch Green.

100% Solar and Battery installation inspections are a must!

More and more articles are appearing on TV and in newspapers about shoddy solar systems.
Although I’m disappointed, I’m not surprised.
Too many people buy on price, unsurprisingly they get exactly what they pay for.
Here’s a letter I sent to all the state energy ministers earlier this week:

Dear Minister,

Last week I held training seminars in Brisbane, Tweed, Sydney, Melbourne and Perth attended by a number of solar installers.
After the completion of training we discussed issues confronting our industry in 2019.

None of us are happy with the standard of installations.
We don’t believe we need more regulation and guidelines, only that the existing regulations are enforced.

In most States, there is no or very little inspection of electrical work.
Around 1% of solar installations are inspected by the Clean Energy Regulator. These inspections have revealed a high level of non-compliance with regulations and guidelines.

The consensus of the training groups was that 100% inspection of all solar and battery installations should be mandatory.
Feedback from Tasmania is that their model has been successful in raising the standard of installations and ‘cleaning out the shonks’.
The Tasmanian model has Techsafe subcontracting to the Department of Justice to carry out 100% inspections.
We would prefer inspections to be carried out by inspectors directly employed by the Electrical Safety Office in each state.
We recognise that this could be a costly exercise and agree that a $250 fee per inspection is reasonable.

There are no barriers to entry in this industry.
Anyone can set up a Facebook page or a webpage, advertise and sell solar systems.
Most of these sales companies have no license to trade as an electrical contractor. Most of them do not display their license on advertising because they don’t have one.
Typically these sales companies sell cheap, shoddy systems with a high failure rate. When the warranty pressure becomes overwhelming they disappear or phoenix to continue under a new name.
We ask that the regulations around unlicensed electrical contracting be strictly enforced.

We agree with the need for an industry code of conduct.
However the consensus view is that a voluntary code of conduct will only be observed by reputable installers who are probably already observing at least the spirit of the proposed codes. The proposed COAG Behind The Meter code is voluntary. There is no obligation for a sales company or installer to sign up.
Observing the BTM code will add operating costs giving the less reputable companies not observing the code a price advantage.
Most reputable installers are members of either NECA, MEA or the Smart Energy Council and have therefore signed up to their codes of conduct.

The Clean Energy Council’s Approved Retailer Scheme is seen as a money grab. Accredited designers and installers already agree to a CEC code of conduct, which is unenforced. We’re sceptical that the CEC has the ability to improve retailer behaviour considering their failure to maintain the installation quality standards of the industry over the past ten or more years. The inclusion of sales companies with history of substandard work and poor ethics calls the integrity of the ARS into question. Subsidised battery installations are already being subcontracted to questionable companies.
CEC’s successful lobbying of state governments to restrict access to tenders and subsidy schemes to ARS’ is seen as anticompetitive, particularly as NECA, MEA and SEC have similar codes of conduct.
We ask that you revisit the decision to restrict access to government tenders and subsidy schemes to CEC Approved Retailers.

From our perspective it appears that the state regulators assumed the CEC had control of the industry and derogated responsibility to the CEC.
The oversight of the industry by the Clean Energy Council has allowed a plethora of unlicensed sales companies to install poor quality, dangerous solar systems. These sales companies use poorly trained, underpaid subcontractors who, in turn use utterly unqualified staff to carry out electrical work.
The CEC has allowed both the solar and battery accreditation courses to be reduced to three day tick and flick, everyone wins a prize events.
Installation of solar panels usually includes running up to 1000 volts DC circuits, capable of creating unquenchable arcs. Batteries store large amounts of energy in chemical form which can be rapidly released (ie explode) in fault conditions.
Unlicensed sales companies sell these systems and poorly trained, skilled and paid workers install them. Very few of these systems are inspected. We already see large numbers of fires caused by poorly installed and designed solar systems. There is no reason to think battery failures will be any less prevalent. Unfortunately battery failures will involve explosions and toxic chemical fires.

Responsibility for electrical safety enforcement is held by state governments.
Subsidies for battery systems expose state governments to reputational damage if and when problems start.

In the interests of consumer safety and the reputation of the renewable industry, we request as a matter of urgency that enforcement of existing electrical rules and regulations by state inspectors be applied.

Yours faithfully
John Inglis
21 January 2019

I have also started a petition on If you agree that electrical safety should be enforced, please sign the petition.

Dangerous Solar Systems

‘Blood on your hands’: Energy Minister’s solar panel warning

This article shows the importance of state regulators and the need for inspections of electrical work.
It shows that solar and battery installations (at least) need to have 100% inspections. This has worked well in Tassie, has cleaned out the ‘3 x 5kW in a day roof monkeys’ and levelled the playing field so that reputable installers can charge a sustainable price for a proper job. Unfortunately the state regulators were under the impression that the CEC/CER regime had the solar industry sorted. They clearly haven’t.
Removal of STCs (or at least a move to metered STCs) will encourage proper design.
Mandatory inspections will ensure proper installation.

John Howard set up the Business Council for Sustainable Energy which morphed into the Clean Energy Council.
Voting rights are set up so that 20 corporate sponsors, including Adani and other foreign owned fossil fuel companies, can outvote all the other members.
5000 solar installers have no vote at all.
The CEC set themselves up as industry regulators, writing ‘installation guidelines’, accrediting installers and removing accreditation when guidelines are breached.
When they’re held to account for the plethora of cheap , broken landfill solar systems they claim they’re not regulators at all and it’s all someone else’s fault, namely the state inspection bodies.
The state inspection bodies were also victims of neoliberalism, for example Joh sacked all electrical inspectors in 1989. Other states followed.
State regulators thought the CEC were looking after solar standards, but in fact they were not – they just made noises as if they were.
Solar installers have been trying to get the CEC or state regulators to do something about poor quality, dangerous systems for years. State regulators refer us to the CEC and the CEC refuse to listen to our complaints because ‘they’re likely to be motivated by competitor rivalry’.
Left with nothing else solar installers started a FB page ‘Crap Solar,’ which has over 5000 members. A page called ‘CEC Installers working together’ was started so we could talk about our concerns. It was quickly changed to ‘Solarcutters working together’ because nobody wanted the CEC in the name. It has nearly 2000 members, which illustrates the contempt the CEC is held in.
The discovery by Angus Taylor this week that a large proportion of solar installations are dangerous came as no surprise to us in the industry. None of this would have happened if the state regulators were allowed to regulate and enforce the rules. Responsible industry members have been calling for 100% inspection of all solar and battery installations by state inspectors for some years now..
The CEC has gone into denial. The CEC response is to ramp up their ‘Approved Retailer Scheme’ which, apart from requiring an annual payment of up to $6000 pa to the CEC for a shiny badge does very little in terms of quality assurance.
The state of the industry makes you wonder whether the CEC are truly incompetent or whether they’re doing exactly what they’re paid to do by their fossil fuelled owners.

If you’re looking for a new, safe solar system contact Positronic Solar – we’ve been doing solar and batteries for 30 years.
If you have concerns about your existing system, contact us for an inspection and clean – it’s about $300 for a 5kW system, plus any repairs or replacements that are needed.
Most importantly, ensure that any installation or maintenance of your solar system is done by a reputable company using gear backed by solid manufacturers with real warranties.

If your solar system needs servicing, call Positronic Solar

This photo illustrates a couple of reasons why you should contact Positronic Solar for solar panel servicing.

The most obvious fail here is getting panels cleaned by a panel cleaning company. They’re almost invariably clueless about the damage done by walking on panels.
They have no expertise in solar at all therefore they’re not going to pick up any problems that your system might have.

This 100kW array is now officially stuffed. It will develop cracks in the wafers reducing its output and eventually causing a fire.

The array design doesn’t help either because no provision has been made for maintenance or making it idiot proof.

If you look at our photos of Estilo on Kittyhawk you’ll see a decent gap between rows and the panels are on a tilt, meaning you’d really have to try hard to walk on them.

If your system needs a clean, call Positronic on 3103 6018. We’ll not only clean them, we’ll go over all the connections, switches etc and advise on any repair work that may be required.

We won’t stand on your panels.

Positronic Solar awards at All Energy

Last week the Clean Energy Council held their annual All Energy conference.
More importantly, Solarcutters held their first gathering.
Positronic picked up a couple of awards for our work with Enphase.
We received the Solarcutter’s Chosen Enphase Award for our Estilo 90kW installation. This award is particularly treasured as it is chosen by our fellow installers around the country. Thank you to our colleagues.
We also received the Tech Wiz award from Enphase for our error free installation record in the past 12 months.

How Much Solar Power Do I Need To Run My Home?

Let’s face it, Australia’s electrical power woes are well documented. In fact, with household utilities increasing by 20% on average in 2017 alone, I challenge you to tell me a person who hasn’t complained about the sky-high cost of their utility bills.

To put this into perspective, the average household electricity prices in Queensland (a little over 27 cents per kw at the time of writing) are:

  • 28% higher than Japan
  • 156% higher than Canada and a staggering…
  • 168% higher than the US.

It’s little wonder then that more and more Australian homeowners are considering turning to solar energy. With this in mind, one of the most frequent questions we get asked is “How much solar power do I really need for my home?” Let’s dive in and take a look closer look.

Solar energy – Explaining the basics

Typically, the relevant size of a solar power system is known by its Peak Volume (PV) amount. This is the amount of electricity your system is likely to produce on a gloriously sunny day. So, a 5kw system, for example, will produce roughly 5000w at peak sunshine. 1kw equals 1000 watts – Got it? Great!

So, if your system was made up of 250w panels you would need 20 x 250w panels in order to collectively generate 5000 watts or 5kw.

So, what can you expect to run with 1kw (1000 watts) of power?

Well, believe it or not, 1000w is sufficient to power:

  • 60 low energy bulbs
  • 2 x 32” plasma screen TV’s
  • 1 small pool pump, and around…
  • One half of a small A/C unit

While that seems pretty good, there’s a catch – I know, there always is!

A 1kw solar system will only give you 1000 watts of power for a few hours a day – Remember peak volume? So your 60 low energy bulbs, for example, will only be working for a short period of time.

So how do you overcome these peaks and troughs?

The answer…by connecting to the electricity grid. Okay, so it may seem counterintuitive to connect to the very thing you’re trying to escape from, but while the grid absorbs any excess energy you don’t use in your home (e.g, when the sun is strong and you aren’t running the A/C) it also works in reverse and can be used to top up your electrical needs when you’re using more power than your solar panels can output.

The question now is…how many solar panels do you need in order to offset your electricity usage?

Here’s how to work it out…

Step 1 – Look at your most recent utility bill and note the amount of KWH’s you’ve used in the previous four quarters. This gives you a better overall representation taking into account the seasons. Let’s imagine you use the national average of 5840 kwh’s per year.

Step 2 – Now divide your annual KWH output by 365 – This gives you a daily figure – For this example that’s 16kwh’s per day!

Step 3 – Now divide your daily figure by the average number of KW hours generated in your city. This will be something like…

  • 2 for Brisbane
  • 6 for Melbourne or
  • 9 for Sydney


Let’s take Brisbane for example as this is where our offices are. So that’s…

16kwh’s divided by 4.2 which gives us a final figure of 3.8

Therefore you would need a 3.8kw solar energy system to generate the same amount of electricity that you currently use.

So there you have it…That’s how you can quickly work out how much solar power you need to run your home.

However…there’s always a ‘but’ right? You need to consider that from an economic perspective, it mightn’t always be the optimal system size you need. So, here’s what we suggest…

Talk to an experienced company who can design a system to suit your exacting needs. This way, not only will you get good advice, but also you’ll get all your questions answered, leaving you with the ability to make a better-informed decision.

Why Your Business Should Consider Going Solar

As a business owner, installing a solar energy system might seem like a risky move. Okay, so you’ve probably heard about large corporations turning to solar power, and maybe it’s something you’re considering in the distant future when your company has grown sufficiently enough to afford the major investment needed to be environmentally ‘good’. But for now, it isn’t a strategic financial decision you really need to think about. Or, so you thought!

Instead, it may be time to join the throng of savvy small business owners that have discovered the real benefits of solar energy for their businesses. Smaller businesses are also capitalising on the financial savings that an ‘all singing all dancing‘ solar energy system provides.

With this in mind, let’s crunch some numbers…This is a financial decision after all, right?

According to Energy Consumer Australia’s preliminary ‘Small to Medium Sized Enterprise (SME) Report’, the average annual electricity bill paid in 2017 by Queensland businesses was approximately $12,000. That’s $1000 per month. In addition,, Australia’s largest online comparison site, suggests that even installing a 5kw solar energy system generating between 18 and 25Kw of power will cut your energy bill by around 21% per year. That’s an average saving of $2520 per year or $210 per month.

Please note that figures are rough estimates and don’t take into account particular business needs

The good news for you is that the cost of buying solar panels has dropped considerably here in Australia and with electricity prices continuing to fluctuate unpredictably, it makes the financials of going solar even more attractive.

Let’s not forget that financial incentive isn’t the only reason to ‘buy into’ solar energy- although it’s a pretty good start 🙂 Instead small and medium-sized businesses are finding that there are other compelling reasons for making the switch. These include:

Gaining more customers

Let’s face it, we live in a world where global issues are important. A world where buzzwords like ‘sustainability’ are being rolled out with extraordinary frequency. So, who’s not going to love a company that proves their commitment to sustainability. Buyers love products and businesses that care about their environment– enough said!

Improving employee satisfaction

Following on from above, 21st-century employees love working for ethically responsible companies. And, it doesn’t come much more responsible than harnessing power from nature. Employees of sustainable companies tend to be happier, more productive, and ‘on-side‘ with the company mission.

Helping the local economy

When a business contracts their solar energy installation to a local company, invariably, workers in the local market carry out the installation. As they get to know you and your company, they’ll develop trust and at some time in the future when they’re in the market for your (insert product or service here) you’ll be the first name on their list.

As you can see, the numbers certainly do stack up. Solar panel systems really are the smart investment for businesses! If you’d like to find out more about how we can help your business, contact Positronic Solar today on 07 3103 6018 and talk to our friendly team of experts.

  • 0735056472
  • Request a Quote
  • Positronic Solar